The Origins and History of Hindutva

Hedgewar and his initial followers during an RSS meeting



Hindutva emerged as a dominant ideology in India promoting the view of the country as the homeland for Hindus with a shared Hindu identity for all inhabitants. Key early proponents included Vinayak Damodar Savarkar and Keshav Hedgewar. Savarkar authored the seminal text "Hindutva: Who is a Hindu?" in 1923 which defined Hindutva and the parameters of Indian nationhood. In this influential work, Savarkar laid out his vision of Hindutva as an ideology seeking to unite all people living in the Indian subcontinent under a shared Hindu identity and culture. He argued that India belonged to those who considered it both their fatherland and holyland. This definition of nationhood was exclusionary towards non-Hindu minority groups like Muslims and Christians.

To propagate these ideas, Keshav Hedgewar founded the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) in 1925 to advocate for Hindu cultural assertions and values through social and cultural organizations. The RSS aimed to strengthen Hindu identity and organize the Hindu population at the grassroots level through cultural and social activities. It advocated the ideology of Hindutva under leaders like Hedgewar and later M.S. Golwalkar, who authored the influential book "We, or Our Nationhood Defined" in 1938. In this seminal work, Golwalkar further developed Hindutva ideology, propagating his vision of cultural assimilation of religious minorities into the Hindu fold to achieve an organic unity within Indian society and nation based on the dominance of Hindu culture and values.

Alongside the cultural wing represented by RSS, Vinayak Savarkar established the more hardline Hindu Mahasabha political party in 1915. As president of the Hindu Mahasabha from 1937-1943, Savarkar aggressively articulated the party's ideological stance and political commitment to establishing India as a nation exclusively for Hindus. The Hindu Mahasabha rejected secular democracy and any provisions or rights for religious minorities, perceiving these as threatening the interests and dominance of the Hindu majority. Under Savarkar's leadership, it advocated the forcible conversion or eviction of Muslims and other minorities who refused to accept Hindu cultural norms.

In 1948, Nathuram Godse, who some allege had links to the RSS, assassinated Mohandas Gandhi for advocating religious pluralism and minority rights. This assassination of the leading proponent of inclusivity heightened the polarization between proponents of Hindutva and those advocating secular nationalism in independent India. In the following decades, the RSS expanded its reach and gained increasing mass support, especially among urban middle class Hindus. It was involved in major political issues like the Ram Janmabhoomi movement demanding the construction of a Hindu temple on the site of the Babri Masjid mosque in Ayodhya. The RSS also led protests against the Mandal Commission report recommending affirmative action for lower castes in 1990, wishing to maintain upper caste Hindu dominance.

The Ram Janmabhoomi campaign led by the VHP and supported by the BJP and RSS eventually resulted in the destruction of the 16th century Babri Masjid mosque in Ayodhya in 1992, causing widespread communal riots between Hindus and Muslims across India. Hindutva groups claimed the site was the birthplace of the Hindu deity Rama and wished to construct a temple there, despite the presence of the centuries-old mosque.

In 2002, communal violence broke out in Gujarat between Hindus and Muslims, resulting in over 1000 deaths, predominantly of Muslims. There were allegations of complicity by state government authorities governed by the BJP under Chief Minister Narendra Modi in allowing the violence to continue unchecked against Muslims. The Gujarat riots reinforced Muslim fears about the safety and status of minorities under growing Hindutva majoritarianism in Indian politics.

Parallelisms to Pakistan

Western Right Connections

The Hindutava Originated Controversy Around the "Aryan Invasion Theory"

Theories about the origins of populations in the Indian subcontinent are highly contested. The older Aryan Invasion Theory proposed a large-scale migration of Indo-Aryan people into India around 1500 BCE, but this has been revised in favor of the multiple migration theory, suggesting gradual migrations and mixing over time. In contrast, the Hindutava-aligned Out of India Theory posits that Indo-Aryan languages and culture originated in India and spread outward. The role of Adivasis, India's indigenous communities, varies depending on the theory: some frame them as pre-Aryan inhabitants, while others attempt to incorporate them into narratives of a unified ancient Indian culture, minimizing their distinct identities and histories.

The multiple migration theory seems most consistent with the substantial evidence surrounding Adivasi communities. Anthropological and genetic studies reveal the incredible diversity of Adivasi groups, suggesting origins distinct from later migrations. Their languages, often belonging to different language families, support this. Adivasi histories and cultural practices showcase unique connections to specific lands and ecosystems, suggesting long-standing habitation rather than displacement by incoming populations. While the Out of India Theory attempts to incorporate Adivasis, it risks homogenizing their diverse identities and undermining their claims to distinct ancestral territories and traditions.

The multiple migration theory challenges the core tenets of Hindutava ideology. Hindutava promotes the concept of a unified and ancient Hindu civilization originating within India. Acknowledging multiple migrations over time complicates this narrative, introducing distinct cultures and groups that existed outside the traditional Hindu fold. This potentially undermines the idea of a singular, dominant Hindu identity with deep roots in the subcontinent. Additionally, the multiple migration theory's emphasis on the distinct origins and long histories of Adivasi communities can clash with Hindutava's tendency to subsume various groups under a broad Hindu umbrella.